陪审团裁定Comcast X1侵权，需赔偿2.13亿美元

5 Min Read (SOURCE: IVAN KMIT/ALAMY STOCK PHOTO) Comcast said it will fight back after a jury in Tampa, Florida, agreed that the operator owes $213 million in damages to WhereverTV after finding that Comcast's X1 video platform infringes on a video technology patent. Per the verdict, posted [here](https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/znvngngnopl/COMCAST%20STREAMING%20PATENT%20VERDICT%20verdict.pdf) by Reuters, the jury found that Comcast infringed on the patent and that Comcast did not provide clear and convincing evidence that the primary claim on the WhereverTV patent is invalid. Comcast said it disagreed with the verdict and it intends to appeal. "While we thank the jury for their consideration, we strongly disagree with today's verdict and the damages awarded, which are unsupported by the facts and law," Comcast said in a statement to Light Reading. "We remain confident that our X1 guide does not infringe WhereverTV's patent, and we will pursue all of our legal options including appeal. This decision has no impact on our customers." The case centered on [US patent number 8,656,431](https://patents.google.com/patent/US8656431B2/en), titled "Global Interactive Program Guide Application and Device." The WhereverTV patent describes technology that uses a global interactive program guide to receive, access, manage and view digital entertainment services, including live TV, on-demand video and pre-recorded video. As WhereverTV described in a [press release](https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/TVTV/news/WhereverTV-Wins-Monumental-Appellate-Victory-in-Ongoing-Legal-Battle-with-Comcast?id=488545) following Thursday's verdict, its patented program guide tech "enables users to watch traditional cable and satellite television channels and streaming services like Netflix all in one place, without having to change a TV's input." Related:[Looking Back: Comcast's Breakthrough X1 Video Service Turns 10](https://www.lightreading.com/video-broadcast/looking-back-comcast-s-breakthrough-x1-video-service-turns-10) Per an "adjusted expiration," documentation shows that WhereverTV's '431 patent expired in August 2026. Though it's now expired, WhereverTV still retains the right to sue and collect damages while it was still active. However, it also means that Comcast avoids an injunction that might have caused it to change how it operates X1. That wasn't the case in an earlier legal fight with TiVo, when Comcast was forced to remove a remote DVR recording function from the Xfinity Stream app. Comcast [later restored that function](https://www.lightreading.com/services/comcast-restores-remote-dvr-recording-function-after-tivo-patents-expire) as related patents expired and after a Patent Trial of Appeals Board invalidated them. Comcast and TiVo [buried the hatchet in 2020](https://www.lightreading.com/cable-technology/comcast-tivo-bury-the-hatchet) when they signed a new patent licensing deal. ##### X1 in WhereverTV's crosshairs WhereverTV's litigation targets X1, Comcast's marquee video platform that delivers traditional pay-TV services along with streaming services such as Netflix, Peacock, HBO Max and Disney+ and a [menu of games](https://www.lightreading.com/cable-technology/comcast-and-rogers-up-their-game-with-amazon-luna) via a unified cloud-powered guide. X1 started as a secretive project code-named "Excalibur" (Light Reading [first caught wind of it in 2009](https://www.lightreading.com/video-broadcast/comcast-forges-excalibur-for-iptv)). Comcast later started calling it "Xcalibur," and ultimately [branded it as X1](https://www.lightreading.com/cloud/comcast-ids-cloud-tv-product-as-x1-). Comcast Chairman and CEO Brian Roberts offered the first glimpse of the platform at the 2011 Cable Show in Chicago (here's a [video snippet](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnXKusflYes&t=16s), taken with a Flip camera, of Roberts' demo). Related:[Comcast Forges 'Excalibur' for IPTV](https://www.lightreading.com/video-broadcast/comcast-forges-excalibur-for-iptv) At the 2012 Cable Show, Comcast announced it had [selected Boston](https://www.lightreading.com/network-technology/cable-technology) as the first market that would get X1. It's now available in all Comcast markets, and the technology eventually expanded to operators such as [Rogers Communications](https://www.lightreading.com/video-broadcast/rogers-sparks-ignite-tv-using-comcast-s-x1), Videotron and [Cox Communications](https://www.lightreading.com/video-broadcast/cox-takes-comcast-x1-platform-national) (now merged with Charter Communications) through syndication agreements. ##### Case took a winding road. Comcast asked SCOTUS to step in The case took several twists and turns prior to this week's jury verdict. In fact, Comcast was initially victorious at a different court and, earlier this year, asked the Supreme Court of the United States to intervene. WhereverTV filed its [original patent infringement complaint](https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flmd.353146/gov.uscourts.flmd.353146.1.0.pdf) in August 2018 in the US District Court for the Middle District of Florida. One of Comcast's main arguments was that WhereverTV failed to present sufficient evidence that a jury would conclude that X1 allowed users to add or delete channels via the interactive program guide. WhereverTV countered in part that managing subscriptions via the guide was akin to adding or deleting channels. Before a jury could start deliberating, the judge in the case [ruled in Comcast's favor in June 2023](https://business.cch.com/ipld/WhereverTVComcastCable20230605.pdf) as a matter of law and tossed out WhereverTV's then-$177 million case. The judge concluded that WhereverTV "did not meet its burden of proof as to this literal infringement argument … [T]o argue literal infringement, WTV must state that subscribing is adding and unsubscribing is deleting." Related:[Comcast IDs Cloud TV Product as 'X1'](https://www.lightreading.com/cloud/comcast-ids-cloud-tv-product-as-x1-) A federal court [overturned the ruling in July 2025](https://www.vitallaw.com/news/patent-fed-cir-wherevertv-s-infringement-lawsuit-against-comcast-cable-revived-on-appeal/ipm0107dd90cc30b44607beb6f896ce65b1e2), holding that the prior ruling incorrectly interpreted certain patent terms, determining in part that adding or deleting channels could include the actions of subscribing and unsubscribing. In addition to vacating the earlier ruling that favored Comcast, the court remanded the case for a new trial. Comcast then looked to SCOTUS for help. Comcast [filed a petition](https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/25/25-820/391122/20260108121154043_Filed%20Comcast%20Petition%20and%20Appendix.pdf) in January 2026 asking SCOTUS to intervene and stop the case from being sent back. The High Court denied the petition in February, but it didn't provide a reason. The SCOTUS denial effectively allowed the case to return to the lower court for a new trial that resulted in this week's jury verdict. ##### WhereverTV doesn't make products, but stock soars after verdict Founded in 2006, WhereverTV does not currently make products and appears to be operating primarily as a holder of intellectual property. Wherever did make a go of it in the early days of video "cord cutting" as consumers started to drop traditional pay-TV subscriptions and lean into Internet-delivered video. In a 2008 story about WhereverTV, [GigaOm reported](https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/external/gigaom/2008/10/31/31gigaom-the-world-is-enough-with-wherevertv-10913.html) about the company's plan to launch a US streaming service initially comprising a customizable lineup of hundreds of international stations, and deliver that content to consumers via a $199 Internet-connected set-top box made by a now-defunct company called Neuros Technology. GigaOm's review of the product was a mixed bag. "Video quality varied wildly; it ranged from decent to downright unwatchable," it said at the time. "The WhereverTV Receiver is something of a niche product, but it's fun to use." WhereverTV's initial focus was to deliver content without a subscription and pay the freight with a free, ad-supported model, [Engadget reported in 2007](https://www.engadget.com/2007-09-07-wherevertv-wants-1-200-channel-piece-of-the-mobile-tv-pie.html). WhereverTV has a limited public presence today. For example, the website it once used at [wherever.tv](https://www.wherever.tv/) is now filled with a bunch of pharmaceutical diagrams. It still has an active [LinkedIn page](https://linkedin.com/company/3301622/) and an [X account](https://x.com/WhereverTV), but it hasn't posted on X (formerly Twitter) since September 2018. WhereverTV does trade on the over-the-counter (OTC) market under the "TVTV" ticker. WhereverTV's stock surged 338.6% Thursday in the wake of the Comcast verdict, closing at $0.25 each. It was down 1 cent (-4%) in Friday morning trading. ## About the Author [](https://www.lightreading.com/author/jeff-baumgartner) Senior Editor, Light Reading Jeff Baumgartner is a Senior Editor for Light Reading and is responsible for the day-to-day news coverage and analysis of the cable and video sectors. Follow him on [X,](https://twitter.com/thebauminator)[LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/in/jeff-baumgartner-036ba829/) and [Bluesky](https://bsky.app/profile/jeffbaumgartner787.bsky.social). Baumgartner also served as Site Editor for Light Reading Cable from 2007-2013. In between his two stints at Light Reading, he led tech coverage for Multichannel News and was a regular contributor to Broadcasting + Cable. Baumgartner was named to the 2018 class of the Cable TV Pioneers.